we're on a road to nowhere // on a quest to analyze and explore the design of business model innovations, i.e. 'hideous and hidden things' like organizational structures and capabilities, corporate strategies and all things related // on a yellow brick road with a girl, a lion and a straw-man wasting our time // …
And there’s a lot of connections indeed, just think about this line: “Create the space for people to make things happen.” Sharing knowledge in corporate creation spaces. Liberating office humans. Social business design.
… doesn’t work when dealing with creative, hard to pre-plan types of work. Knowledge work, yes. Much better to equip people with autonomy, mastery and a sense of purpose.
And that’s putting up some interesting questions with regard to leadership styles (command and control is doomed …), the organization and improving of collaborative work (facilitating connections and conversations through social software in the enterprise comes to mind … well, yes this needs some serious multi-pillar implementation efforts to succeed) and overall how a (shared) sense of purpose can be entertained be agreed upon be managed for? And is it a deformation professionelle that I am seeing an important place for social software and sustainable Enterprise 2.0 endeavours in this sense-making space too?
Some of my notes:
- subject matter experts for business applications are not developers
- opportunities for collaboration: building communities (where none exist)
- the job of the Collaborative Software Initiative is to assess and build core teams, balancing requirements and benefits – i.e. they act as a network facilitator providing training and coaching
- main job is acting as central node and connector, i.e. supporting inter-company collaboration for open source (and soon commodity software)
- collaboration in this space makes a lot of sense from a strategy perspective, Stuart talked about reasons in three arenas – technology, social networking and “organizational dynamics”
There was a lot of content in Stuarts talk, and very dense charts, will link to them as soon as they get published.
Have another sunday treat? Try this one, video with Dr. David Vaine who in his video address to the actKM Conference adresses all participants and especially “my good friend Dennis (sic!) Snowden” (and David Greenteen too, sic!) – found via Mary Abraham and Green Chameleon:
[...] minimal impact KM touts the benefits of doing a great deal without in any way affecting the work lives of your colleagues or the results of your enterprise [...]
Dr. Vaine identifies several proven methods of achieving minimal impact KM:
- depreciative inquiry
- social network paralysis
- corporate flogging
- six stigma
Innovation begins and ends with people, individuals who have the courage to push the boundaries. It also requires a corporate culture that nurtures and rewards creative thinking, where people feel comfortable enough to voice new ideas, no matter how small. That is where successful leadership comes in. A skilled and innovative leader must be a fearless visionary committed to backing bold ideas.
Innovate or Die:
Mel Kamarzin, CEO of Sirius Radio believes “there is no punishment that goes for taking a chance, making a decision”. Yet too often firms don’t take the steps really required to innovate because they want to protect their existing offerings. They seal their fate by doing just enough to get by. Fear of changing the status quo can be paralysing but if you are not moving forward and innovating in today’s challenging economic environment, it’s worse than standing still. You’re effectively moving backwards.
Innovation can be a hard concept to pin down. That’s why defining what it means to an organisation is the first step towards truly engaging customers. Radical thinking needs to be employed to come up with the blue-sky ideas. To turn those ideas into revenue generators means making a creative leap beyond the nuts and bolts of a product and really connecting with consumers. Ursula Burns, Chief Executive of Xerox says, “Customers can’t really articulate always what they want. They give you a rough outline”.
... another home on the internets for Martin Koser.
He's an independent enterprise collaboration consultant with frogpond most of his time, yet he's written more than 1.000 posts here since 2004.
Petersilie gefällig? podcast mp3 anbei (auch für Nicht-Süddeutsche verständlich ;)
Der Kultur-, bzw. Kunstbegriff ist brüchig geworden: Die Ökonomisierung der Kultur und die Kulturalisierung der Ökonomie hebeln die konventionellen Wertevorstellungen aus. Die Kunst verliert ihre Aura und die Kultur scheint mit den Erwartungen, die an sie gerichtet werden, überfordert zu sein.
Über diese Entwicklungen diskutieren die Kulturwissenschaftlerin Gesa Ziemer und der Soziologe Dirk Baecker.
reading @doctorow at the #guardian and the comments make my day, e.g. on iPad and stuff:
"It doesn't matter if a technology is a standard or not - the user is denied the choice to run software on a device they bought. It's not limited to Flash either (though Flash has been at the forefront of discussions). The way the terms and conditions apply, that's no Silverlight, no Java, and any other browser-based plug-ins and frameworks that can be conjured up. It also means developers cannot so easily choose frameworks they may prefer."
Diplomarbeit: Wissensmanagement Reloaded - Ein Ordnungsrahmen für den systemischen Umgang mit Wissen im Enterprise 2.0
Gegenstand dieser Arbeit ist die Konstruktion eines Ordnungsrahmens für den systemischen Umgang mit Wissen im Enterprise 2.0. Dieser Ordnungsrahmen zeigt Einsatzpotentiale und Handlungsfelder des Enterprise 2.0-Konzepts für Wissensmanagement systematisch auf und vermittelt ein Verständnis über die Zusammenhänge zwischen den Gestaltungsdimensionen Mensch, Organisation und Technologie im speziellen Fall des Enterprise 2.0.
Ergänzend zu den theoretisch erarbeiteten Aspekten wird der konzipierte Ordnungsrahmen verwendet, um die Eignung eines realen Enterprise 2.0-Ansatzes (Wiki-Plattform) für Wissensmanagement zu bewerten
re: #facebook 4 #twitter 2 // and I think this is spot on
"With low customer satisfaction, Facebook is vulnerable to the next great idea, the next social networking tool that provides a better, more unique experience that allows people to manage their social networks much like they do in the real world, with subtlety and nuance. Facebook has the incumbent's advantage, and the power and resources to make some needed changes, so it may continue to dominate. But I don't think Facebook dominance is a given by any means."
Great post and comments on business model models and visualizations, many quotes - here's only one from a commenter:
"[...] all models/frameworks simplify reality. So true. He also reminds us of the essence of what the business model canvas is after.
I believe one way we maintain integrity in the use of the model/framework is done just the way you have tackled this issue: precise definitions of terms. The “customer” is the one who pays. Yes, their may be many other users or beneficiaries of an organization’s offerings, but they are something other than customers."
Somehow there's no information about data plans for #denmark - somebody in the know knwo more (I better ask #twitter about this too)
Snip
"This wiki aims to collect information about pay as you go mobile phone plans from all over the world. Not just any plans though, they must include decent data rates, perfect for iPhone and Android smart phone travellers."
"Where do you think we are headed as far as information being leaked and disseminated?
To somebody concerned with keeping secrets, I guess my message would be that it could always get worse.
If we were to see some effective attack on WikiLeaks, either legal or technological, it’s entirely likely that this [document leaking] would kind of mirror what we’ve seen in the copyright wars over popular music and entertainment — in other words what you’ll see will be even more distributed systems for leaking. You can get to a place where there’s nobody to talk to, nobody to reason with. Stuff just gets out there."
Granted, some information (guess what?) does need to be private but I so like the interplay of #opendata and #technology