a nice commentary that hit my soft spot …

Think back to the heyday of Napster, when a befuddled music industry was confronted for the first time with massive file sharing. It was a crisis. Since then, the tech market has responded with all sorts of innovations: Selling songs online, subscriptions, packaging music with video, and limiting file sharing through software. Compared to those early days, content companies have lots of ways to make money in the era of broadband–even though file sharing persists. [...].

My question, as the Supreme Court debates Grokster, is this: Is the music industry fighting to survive, or simply to return to the days of easy money?

Fact is, both extremes are unlikely. No matter what happens with Grokster, the traditional music industry will keep on swinging. But the days of easy money are long gone.

Quelle …

well, I do think that the music industry will persist (and it should so rightly), as long as it leverages its strengths and consequently develops innovative business models based thereon … the key question remains how to develop and implement innovative business models …

Intel and Bertelsmann plan to cooperate in developing technology for downloading and sharing films, music clips and games from the Internet. This report is positioning this move in the wider context of the digital home, something that I will write more on later on.

Well, to me this smells a lot like the infamous “trusted computing platform” of late, when the hard-/software will actively hinder any attempt to infringe rules, but, hey, who is defining these rules of “proper use” … seems like Intel and Bertelsmann want to have a say when these rules will be coded – no surprise here.
The report states no more technical details, but, to my joy, it rightly states that:

Bertelsmann also has shown more flexibility and daring than its peers [in the media/music industry].

because, yes, it started early on, like the investment in Napster or by trying ventures like the late Snoopster (which nobody besides me seems to remember …) and alltogether has shown great flexibility and attitude.

read more @ Reuters …

Update zu MGM vs. Grokster …

a ruling isn’t expected until July, so don’t hold your breath. No matter what the outcome though, one thing is for certain – the high court’s decision will directly affect how people use entertainment and share information for years to come. [...] it is entirely possible that the entertainment companies will end up making more money than ever before (just like what happened with the VCR…)

read more @ Wired

mehr zu den Hintergründen und der Diskussion in Verbindung zu Innovationen bspw. bei Telepolis.

Hier auch diese Feststellung:

Nicht zu vergessen bleibt jedenfalls, dass die Unterhaltungsindustrie letztlich immer die “Piraterie” über- und kommerzielle Nutzungsmöglichkeiten neuer Techniken unterschätzte.

… in der Medienindustrie … und die Gefahren der Verlinkung. Nicht mehr allein die Musik- und Filmindustrie ist bedroht, sondern auch Informationshändler wie Presseagenturen:

It is the architecture of the web itself that gives the recording industry and motion picture industry fits, and the same structure is now apparently exposing media empires to risk.

Der Text geht dann auf die Klage von AFP gegen Google ein, ein wahrhaft idiotisches Unterfangen, denn wie steht es da so richtig:

all Google News is doing is providing more customers to AFP’s clients

Die Verteidugung alter Geschäftsmodelle hat ihre Grenzen, es stellt sich die Frage ob die Energien nicht besser in die Entwicklung neuer, innovativer Modelle fließen sollten:

The media world is changing, and I think fighting the change is ultimately self-destructive. The energy and resources spent trying to protect old business models would be much better spent in the development of new models.

weiterlesen bei Media Center

… man darf gespannt sein wie das Urteil ausgeht, hoffen wir auf die Einsicht in den Betamax-Präzedenzfall – oder?
morgen früh ist es jedenfalls soweit … zu den Hintergründen und zur Bedeutung für Innovation, innovative Technologien und Geschäftsmodelle ein weiterer kleiner Artikel, diesmal von BusinessWeek, nicht viel neues, aber die Kommentatorin Lorraine Woellert trifft im letzten Absatz den Nagel dennoch auf den Kopf …

Ever since the invention of the player piano, the reigning entertainment titans of the day have fought new technologies, most recently taking up arms against VCRs, CDs, and MP3 players. Each time, they eventually came to recognize the value of these innovations, for themselves and for their customers. P2P — and whatever as-yet-unimagined technologies might follow — will be no different.

read more @ BusinessWeek …

enjoy uncertainty.jpg 

… and don’t you dare to use any other MP3-Players …  

Ein kleiner Text in der neuen Ausgabe von
Wired zur Konkurrenz zwischen Blu-Ray und HD-DVD … gut beobachtet ist dass der Kampf wohl umsonst sein wird weil online distribution beide obsolet machen wird:

[...] Blu-ray and HD-DVD, and the powerful coalitions that aim to bring them to market. With Sony and other device manufacturers on one side and Toshiba and Hollywood on the other, the fight has the makings of a brutal VHS versus Betamax-style war.

Only this time, neither format will win. And the battle will end up hurting early adopters, as well as the companies slugging it out. And the worst part is, the fight doesn’t matter. These technologies aren’t the future of home entertainment. What is? Online distribution, bolstered by increasing bandwidth and more efficient data compression.

Wired weiterlesen bei Wired …