BBC article … nothing great, the misc. gems are noted hereafter … it caught my attention because of its provoking headline … that was chosen for catchiness’ sake … luring the unsuspecting reader … <\/p>\n
It is unlikely that future technological inventions are going to transform the world in the way that they done before now.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Sorry, this is crap … and they know it, we’ve heard it times and times before that everything’s already discovered … remember the physics professor of the beginning 20th century who discouraged prospective physics students “Don’t study physics, everything of interest is known already” … and then came 1905 and Albert Einstein.<\/p>\n
So many problems remain in this world, sure they won’t be all solved by technology, innovation and inventions alone .. but I’m pretty sure that there’s much to come … <\/p>\n
Some phrases are catchy and on point though …<\/p>\n
But what it means for technology companies is that a new idea, method, or device, will have to have a different kind of thinking behind it so that people see the value that innovative technology has for them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
and <\/p>\n
[for] innovation […] you need to be multidisciplinary and collaborative<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The articel goes on and presents numerous examples, e.g. nanotechnology, of innovations that matter … funny thing is, these are<\/strong> examples of technologies that may alter peoples life real much<\/strong> … <\/p>\n