We’re more than individuals in groups – we’re nodes in social networks and community members …

Found via PSST (about some 8 months late, funny – given my Kubrick fascination I should have seen that one earlier  …)

Lee Bryant zur Big Society Initiative in UK:

“We badly need new ideas and new approaches, especially since the gulf between rising demands on public services and available funding to meet them is growing ever wider. More than anything, we need approaches that go with the grain of human behaviour and motivation, and which understand that society is comprised of inter-related complex systems, rather than reductionist management control methods.”

Und viel mehr zur “Konstruktion” von Capable Communities, Co-design, Partizipation et al. – und wie man mit sozialen Netzwerken Veränderung fördern kann.

Gefunden via Experientia, wieder einmal fünf Minuten bevor ich den Headshift Feed selbst gesehen hätte, dieses Muster wiederholt sich, aber das haben Muster so an sich …

Nice to see people like Don Tapscott, Lee Bryant, JP Rangaswami and Clay Shirky have their say. Nice too, that it leaves me in a positive mood, which isn’t natural in these times ( link goes to a german language article on the sad state of the “Internet inflicted changes discussion” in Germany, sadly it’s not a German thing alone).

Movie blurb:

In his student flat in Colchester, Jack Howe is staring intently into his computer screen. He is picking the team for Ebbsfleet United’s FA Trophy Semi-Final match against Aldershot . Around the world 35,000 other fans are doing the same thing, because together, they own and manage the football club. If distributed networks of people can run complex organisations such as football clubs, what else can they do? […]

Us Now follows the fate of Ebbsfleet United, a football club owned and run by its fans; Zopa, a bank in which everyone is the manager; and Couch Surfing, a vast online network whose members share their homes with strangers.

Yes, together, we work smarter. Smarter being all things agile, flexible, you know, see here and there …

via Stefan

by Clay Shirky is an “examination of how the wildfire-like spread of new forms of social interaction enabled by technology is changing the way humans form groups and exist within them, with profound long-term economic and social effects-for good and for ill”

It’s about how the tools of the web enable people to organize without formality, but doesn’t stop there but includes ideas about how organizations might use community tools like social software to build stronger customer relations, communities of practice and more

Some take-aways, all highlighting by me:

You can think of group undertaking as a kind of ladder of activities, activities that are enabled or improved by social tools. The rungs on the ladder, in order of difficulty, are sharing, cooperation, and collective action …

Hmm, ladders everywhere – nice metaphor but somehow flawed: We don’t leave the rungs when we step up, we just build upon them.

Anyway, looks interesting. Check out the mp3 of a discussion with Brian Eno and Clay Shirky (there are also some video snippets). Here’s the blurb of this recent evening at ICA:

Everywhere we look, it seems, companies and organisations are trying to harness the alleged wisdom of crowds – the power of groups of people to come together through the internet and share with one another, work together, or take some kind of collective public action. One of the world’s leading experts on social and technological networking, Clay Shirky, Professor in the Interactive Telecommunications Program at New York University and the author of Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organising without Organisations, comes to the ICA to talk about how the idea of networks, and particularly online social networks, is changing everything around us.

Experientia has collected more stuff:

- Book site
- Review by Cory Doctorow on BoingBoing
- Review by Helen Walters and Matt Vella in Business Week
- Interview with author by The Guardian newspaper

There’s another interview with him, conducted by Jon Lebkowsky at the World Changing site, talking about different media uses and preferences of people:

[Shirky:] Here is my hypothesis: that one of the things that people create some kind of really deep mental model for is modes of communication. People my age and older have a very good sense of when to call someone on the phone, and when to send them a personal letter, and when to go see them. But we don’t have such a good sense of when to email them, or IM them, or Twitter or what have you, because all of that stuff was invented after we had already solidified our sense of the media landscape. All of those things are still new.

And here’s a video of Clay Shirky discussing HCE, found at the Berkman Center, uploaded by Robert to Sevenload for easy embedding:

And there’s also David Weinberger who was live blogging Shirky’s book presentation at Harvard, extracting the key points about group forming, collaboration and the effects of social software:

[...] Now we’re seeing a set of tools that make it easier to create large groups: Ridiculously easy group forming. E.g., email unexpectedly became the dominant service used on the original Internet. That was because of the “reply all” button, a social feature.

But there’s been an enormous social lag. This tech has not transformed society as rapidly as it might. That’s because groups are innately conservative. No one wants a protocol that shuts out group members. It needed to become ubiquitous and boring. That’s when the social effects become interesting.

Well, yes, while we’re not there yet we’ll be there in no time. Now back to Twittering.

Wenn es bislang noch irgendwelche Zweifel daran gab, dass das Mitmach-Web auch die letzten Winkel der etablierten IT- und Medienkonzerne durchdrungen hat, wurden sie beim diesjährigen Web 2.0 Summit ausgeräumt.

[...] der “Social Graph” – also die dynamischen Listen von angeblichen Freunden und Bekannten, deren Vorlieben und Aktivitäten – [hat sich] als neuester Trend etabliert

Und zu Plattformen als Grundlage für Geschäftsmodellinnovationen:

Tragbare Inhalte vom Video bis zum Landkarten-Mashup, die sich auf jeder anderen Seite einbetten lassen, haben den Siegeszug des Web als Plattform besiegelt, sagte Googles Chefingenieur Jeff Huber: “Das Wettrennen der Plattformen ist vorbei. Das Web ist die Plattform.” So habe sich ein Mosaik aus Gadgets und Widgets durchgesetzt – kleinere, flexible Container für Datenströme aus den unterschiedlichsten Quellen, die zuweilen bereits ineinander verschachtelt sind.

Die Blog-Berichterstattung vom Web 2.0 Summit ist umfassend, aber auch ziemlich redundant, das muss aber kein schlechtes Zeichen sein.

Mehr zu Facebook et al. hier im BMID-blog.

“Anyone who builds their entire business on top of a closed or semi-closed system is a fool.”